Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
Name or Email:   Password:   Register Now  
Search Stuck Mic
 
  #1
Offline
boondr
PHD without a degree
North of the Equator
2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-24-2009, 12:31 AM

http://www.govexec.com/pdfs/122409m1a.pdf
Page 9

SCHEDULE 9--LOCALITY-BASED COMPARABILITY PAYMENTS
(Effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period
beginning on or after January 1, 2010)
Locality Pay Area1 Rate
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL. . . . . . . . . 19.29%
Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH-RI-ME. . . . . . . . . 24.80%
Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.98%
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI. . . . . . . . 25.10%
Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN . . . . . . . 18.55%
Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.68%
Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.16%
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.67%
Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.24%
Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.52%
Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.09%
Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT-MA . . . . . . . . 25.82%
Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28.71%
Huntsville-Decatur, AL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.02%
Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 14.68%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA. . . . . . . . . . . 27.16%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL . . . . . . . . . 20.79%
Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.10%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI . . . . . . . . . . 20.96%
New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA . . . . . . . . . 28.72%
Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD . . . . . . . 21.79%
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.76%
Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.37%
Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA . . . . . . . . . . . 20.35%
Raleigh-Durham-Cary, NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.64%
Richmond, VA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.47%
Sacramento?Arden-Arcade?Yuba City, CA-NV. . . . . . . . . 22.20%
San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.19%
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA . . . . . . . . . . . 35.15%
Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.81%
Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA 24.22%
Rest of U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.16%
Sponsored Ad
Google Adsense

  #2
Offline
Cirrus12
Epic Member
So. NH
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-27-2009, 10:55 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by boondr View Post
http://www.govexec.com/pdfs/122409m1a.pdf
Page 9

SCHEDULE 9--LOCALITY-BASED COMPARABILITY PAYMENTS
(Effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period
beginning on or after January 1, 2010)
Locality Pay Area1 Rate
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL. . . . . . . . . 19.29%
Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH-RI-ME. . . . . . . . . 24.80%
Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.98%
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI. . . . . . . . 25.10%
Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN . . . . . . . 18.55%
Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.68%
Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.16%
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.67%
Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.24%
Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.52%
Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.09%
Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT-MA . . . . . . . . 25.82%
Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28.71%
Huntsville-Decatur, AL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.02%
Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN. . . . . . . . . . . . 14.68%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA. . . . . . . . . . . 27.16%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL . . . . . . . . . 20.79%
Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.10%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI . . . . . . . . . . 20.96%
New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA . . . . . . . . . 28.72%
Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD . . . . . . . 21.79%
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.76%
Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.37%
Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA . . . . . . . . . . . 20.35%
Raleigh-Durham-Cary, NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.64%
Richmond, VA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.47%
Sacramento?Arden-Arcade?Yuba City, CA-NV. . . . . . . . . 22.20%
San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.19%
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA . . . . . . . . . . . 35.15%
Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.81%
Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA 24.22%
Rest of U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.16%
Wow, I was actually expecting them to go down a little this year.
  #3
atcguruaf's Avatar
atcguruaf
Rico Suave
AZ
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-27-2009, 02:15 PM

Thanks for the info Boondr, much appreciated!
  #4
Ramstar13's Avatar
Offline
Ramstar13
Senior Member
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-27-2009, 02:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus12 View Post
Wow, I was actually expecting them to go down a little this year.
they cant go down i believe, can only stay or go up
  #5
AirborneJFO's Avatar
Offline
AirborneJFO
Senior Member
Westbury, NY
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-27-2009, 08:00 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramstar13 View Post
they cant go down i believe, can only stay or go up
not true for all sectors of government.

Army cuts housing allowance for Fairbanks soldiers: Military | adn.com
  #6
Offline
boondr
PHD without a degree
North of the Equator
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-27-2009, 08:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AirborneJFO View Post
BAH is different than Locality (mainly one is taxable)
  #7
atcguruaf's Avatar
atcguruaf
Rico Suave
AZ
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-28-2009, 01:58 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramstar13 View Post
they cant go down i believe, can only stay or go up
they can go down. Locality is based on a complex formula, like the complexity index. I have yet to see it, but it was brought to my attention via the HR department.
  #8
AirborneJFO's Avatar
Offline
AirborneJFO
Senior Member
Westbury, NY
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-28-2009, 04:18 AM

COLA vs. BAH vs. Locality.... yes, it is different, however....they don't usually go down.
  #9
GolfJuliet's Avatar
Offline  
GolfJuliet
F*** Terrorism
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-28-2009, 09:10 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by atcguruaf View Post
based on a complex formula, like the complexity index
Kinda like the hiring process lol
  #10
mklatval's Avatar
Offline
mklatval
Rookie
Burlington VT
Re: 2010 Locality percentages
Posted: 12-28-2009, 12:06 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by atcguruaf View Post
they can go down. Locality is based on a complex formula, like the complexity index. I have yet to see it, but it was brought to my attention via the HR department.
It's supposed to be based on an index but it isn't. Look up FEPCA if your interested, the locality rates we have now are mostly decided by politics.

Powered by Stuck Mic Copyright StuckMic.com
Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
© 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved
Current time: 03:23 PM (All times are GMT -5)

Stuck Mic - Air Traffic Control - ATC - Aviation