![]() |
| (Chat and discussion topics: air traffic control, chat room, alpa, aircraft, news, controller, bargaining units, chat, approach control, ata, aviation enthusiasts, natcanet, tracon, tower, dod, air traffic controller, air traffic controllers, tower controller, tower controllers, approach, approach controllers, aviation, approaches, tracons, control, TRACON, ATC, ARTCC, RADAR, NATCA, FAA, IFR, VFR, PATCO, ALPA, DOD, ATA, AOPA, centers, towers, facilities, pilots, airlines, airplanes, federal employee, union, labor union, bargaining unit, contract, discussion, federal employees, unions, labor unions, contracts, discussions, national, association, natcavoice, aviation enthusiast) |
| THREAD: | 7110.65 Question | ||
| SUBJECT: | Visual_Approachs_and_Terrain | ||
| TO: | Roddy_Piper | ||
| FROM: | hamchuck | ||
| POSTED: | 3/16/2008, 10:01PM EDT | ||
in the en route environment i work an airport that has a 12,800 foot MIA, but the field elevation is 5,900. i lose the aircraft on radar well before he lands so i would have already terminated radar service and switched the aircraft to advisory frequency. if there was a tower there i'm not sure what they would use. MIA probably. 2000 feet above the highest obstacle in mountainous terrain.
hamchuck wrote: [TO: Roddy_Piper]
"MVA, MOCA, MIA, and MSAW does not apply to the visual approach"...We know that (I am in an FAA VFR Tower), but our idiot FLM says we have to say it to everyone that sets off the MSAW (Visual or IAP). We are trying to find something in the .65 that spells it out. The ICAO definition (of Visual Approach) in the PC/G says pilots maintain visual separation with terrain, but the "real" definition doesn't say squat about it.
Any other ideas
The main reason for the question is that the same idiot FLM used that and some other chicken
stuff (missed a few ATIS codes and incorrect call signs) to pull one of our guys' local ticket and put him in ODP.
You heard right folks...no OE, no OD, no prior history of performance problems. The FLM did a "Performance skill check" on the guy (didn't tell him he was doing it) and two weeks later pulls his ticket.
Needless to say we are doing everything we can to help the guy beat this bum wrap, (and save the rest of us from getting caught in the same trap) so any advise will help.
| JOIN NOW! | ||
| < < < -- PREVIOUS MESSAGE | NEXT MESSAGE -- > > > | |
| |15|14|13|12|11|10|9|8|7|6|5|4|3|2|1| | <-BACK | |1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15| |
StuckMic exists for the sole purpose of providing a FREE discussion forum by which issues affecting the world's aviation community can be openly discussed absent formal bureaucratic hierarchies. StuckMic is an independent, issue-neutral corporality not associated with any labor organization(s) or government entities of any country. Whether you're an air traffic controller, a pilot or an aviation enthusiast, StuckMic is a great place to exchange ideas and find inside aviation information you won't find anywhere else. We maintain a diverse range of members including pilots, air traffic controllers (Center, Tower, Approach and TRACON), NATCA members, ALPA members, PATCO members and aviation enthusiasts from around the globe. "Honest feedback from the aviation community with |