1968 Roadrunner68 Roadrunnerchat, air traffic control, chat room, air traffic controllerchat, air traffic control, chat room, air traffic controllerdiscuss, air traffic controllers, discussion, tower controllertower controllers, approach, approach control, approach controllerscontroller, air traffic, approach controller, controllers, aviationapproaches, tracons, aircraft, control, tracon, atc, artccradar, natca, faa, ifr, vfr, patco, dod, aopa, center, towerfacility, pilot, airline, airplane, centers, towers, facilitiespilots, airlines, airplanes
Stuckmic.com Aviation and Air Traffic Control discussion

aviation, aviation enthusiasts, aircraft
(Chat and discussion topics: aviation, approach control, federal employee, PATCO, tower controller, natca, bargaining units, centers, chat, controllers, air traffic control, contracts, ata, towers, facilities, pilots, airlines, airplanes, chat room, air traffic controller, air traffic controllers, tower controllers, approach, approach controllers, controller, approaches, tracons, aircraft, control, TRACON, ATC, ARTCC, RADAR, NATCA, FAA, IFR, VFR, ALPA, DOD, ATA, AOPA, union, labor union, bargaining unit, contract, discussion, federal employees, unions, labor unions, discussions, news, natcanet, national, association, natcavoice, aviation enthusiasts, aviation enthusiast)

approach controllers, controller
Welcome to StuckMic.com, an aviation and air traffic control discussion forum!

air traffic controller, tower controller
Below is a sample message posted by one of our hundreds of users.

airplane, airplanes, airline, airlines

pilot, pilots, FAA, IFR, VFR, faa, ifr
vfr, NATCA, PATCO, ALPA, ATA, natcaTHREAD:Gigantes56's Thread
patco, alpa, ata, union, unionsSUBJECT:Any_MEM_here?
labor unions, bargaining unitsTO:Gregg
bargaining unit, contracts, contractFROM:TPaddack
natcanet, national, associationPOSTED: 2/1/2008, 2:53PM EDT

Gregg wrote[TO: TPaddack]
This is the part of you I really dislike Terry. For someone who seem to have a brain 55% of the time the rest of you really leaves me laughing. Explain to me in some kind of rhetoric that makes sense why his views are laughable and yours are not And why is your opinion allowed to be on this site--and heaven forbid anyone slams them, but his can't I mean how long have we all put up with your drivel about the glorious PATCO days, and your anti-Reagan crap, and your anti-Bush tirades. Believe it or not---many feel you might be just as offensive as what NSU7 is posting, but we usually accept it gracefully. But I understand--you can't be a true Liberal Democrat unless you thumb your nose at someone who believes differently and then insults them.

Gregg

TPaddack wrote[TO: Gregg]
I'll not even address most of the ass wipe and fabrication of actually facts in your diatribe above.

The fact of the matter is that you and NSU7 had a long discussion about religion and other items. I actually found it very interesting. I said not a word. Then the man decided to denigrate a group of people by stating that "gay marriage is the cause of the decline western civilization". I was shocked that you (as a Christian) or anyone else didn't call him on it.

This is the kind of rhetoric that is hateful and discriminatory. And wrong. Yet instead of informing the person of that, you choose to go along and aim your darts at me.

As a person with a gay cousin, gay nephew, gay sister-in-law, and numerous gay friends, for me personally I couldn’t let the statement go by. That was personal choice to say it was wrong. You’re going to have to point out to me where I said he couldn’t have that opinion. If I did, then I will apologize to him. I merely indicated that his statement wanted to make me go berserk.

It has nothing to do with being a liberal democrat (speaking of name calling - is there such a thing in your world as a moderate democrat, or are they all liberal) or being a republican. It has to do with telling someone they are wrong in their opinion. Just as you are wrong about just about everything you said in your post.

JOIN NOW!news, atc, ATC, air traffic, control100% FREE!
< < < -- PREVIOUS MESSAGE NEXT MESSAGE -- > > >
|15|14|13|12|11|10|9|8|7|6|5|4|3|2|1| <-BACKair traffic control, air traffic controllersFORWARD->|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|

air traffic control, aviation, chat
tower controllers, approach controller

air traffic control, aviation, chat room

StuckMic exists for the sole purpose of providing a FREE discussion forum by which issues affecting the world's aviation community can be openly discussed absent formal bureaucratic hierarchies.

StuckMic is an independent, issue-neutral corporality not associated with any labor organization(s) or government entities of any country.

Whether you're an air traffic controller, a pilot or an aviation enthusiast, StuckMic is a great place to exchange ideas and find inside aviation information you won't find anywhere else. We maintain a diverse range of members including pilots, air traffic controllers (Center, Tower, Approach and TRACON), NATCA members, ALPA members, PATCO members and aviation enthusiasts from around the globe.

There are NO requirements ... join for FREE!

JOIN OUR DISCUSSION FORUM

OR PERUSE OUR MESSAGES AS A GUEST!
controllers, federal employee


"Honest feedback from the aviation community with
all the usual political and bureaucratic filters removed..."


federal employees, facilities, tracon
TRACON, tracons, approach, approaches