1968 Roadrunner68 Roadrunnerchat, air traffic control, chat room, air traffic controllerchat, air traffic control, chat room, air traffic controllerdiscuss, air traffic controllers, discussion, tower controllertower controllers, approach, approach control, approach controllerscontroller, air traffic, approach controller, controllers, aviationapproaches, tracons, aircraft, control, tracon, atc, artccradar, natca, faa, ifr, vfr, patco, dod, aopa, center, towerfacility, pilot, airline, airplane, centers, towers, facilitiespilots, airlines, airplanes
Stuckmic.com Aviation and Air Traffic Control discussion

aviation, aviation enthusiasts, aircraft
(Chat and discussion topics: centers, approach, PATCO, natcanet, chat room, pilot, air traffic control, aviation, natca, ARTCC, news, federal employee, pilots, TRACON, airplanes, FAA, approaches, tracons, aircraft, control, tracon, atc, artcc, radar, faa, ifr, vfr, patco, alpa, dod, ata, aopa, center, tower, facility, airline, airplane, chat, air traffic, air traffic controller, tower controllers, approach control, approach controller, controller, controllers, union, labor union, bargaining unit, contract, discussion, federal employees, unions, labor unions, bargaining units, contracts, discussions, national, association, natcavoice, aviation enthusiasts, aviation enthusiast)

approach controllers, controller
Welcome to StuckMic.com, an aviation and air traffic control discussion forum!

air traffic controller, tower controller
Below is a sample message posted by one of our hundreds of users.

airplane, airplanes, airline, airlines

pilot, pilots, FAA, IFR, VFR, faa, ifr
vfr, NATCA, PATCO, ALPA, ATA, natcaTHREAD:News's Thread
patco, alpa, ata, union, unionsSUBJECT:Groups_Oppose_User_Fees—Again
labor unions, bargaining unitsTO:ALL
bargaining unit, contracts, contractFROM:68dart
natcanet, national, associationPOSTED: 2/7/2008, 9:21AM EDT

News wrote[TO: ALL]
AVWEB: Groups Oppose User Fees—Again


At last October's National Business Aviation Association meeting in Atlanta, leaders of the major general aviation groups agreed that despite headway made in Congress on the user fee issue, they believed the matter was far from settled. On Monday, with the FAA functioning on an extension of its 2007 budget because of the administration's failed attempt to restructure the agency's finance structure in last year's budget, the White House again called for a budget including a user fee-based system that levies a $25 per leg charge on turbine-powered GA aircraft. It also cuts funding for the Airport Improvement Program. NBAA, which has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars lobbying against user fees, is pledging to keep up the fight as are other groups. "Once again, the Bush administration wants huge new taxes and user fees imposed on general aviation, and it wants to slash and burn the Airport Improvement Program," Pete Bunce, president and CEO of the General Aviation Manufacturers Association, said. "What part of 'NO ' doesn’t the White House understand " asked AOPA President Phil Boyer. "Despite Congress saying 'no' to the Administration's proposal to scrap the current funding mechanism for a less efficient one that imposes user fees, they have once again launched an effort to complete a FAA reauthorization bill by proposing the exact same failed plan," he said. DOT Secretary Mary Peters insisted the system needs to change. "Traditional approaches are not capable of producing the results we need to keep America's economy growing," she said. Meanwhile, Acting FAA Administrator Bobby Sturgell gave a "terse defense" of the administration's decision to recycle a reauthorization proposal that failed last year in Congress, wrote the Wall Street Journal. "There are no cha nges," S turgell said.

68dart wrote[TO: ALL]
Last time I checked, the DOT was not responsible for ensuring that the economy continues to grow. It's a regulatory and oversight agency, same as the FAA. I just wish they'd stop all the BS and get back to regulation and oversight, and stop being economic cheerleaders. It's not a business, no matter how many times they say it.

JOIN NOW!news, atc, ATC, air traffic, control100% FREE!
< < < -- PREVIOUS MESSAGE NEXT MESSAGE -- > > >
|15|14|13|12|11|10|9|8|7|6|5|4|3|2|1| <-BACKair traffic control, air traffic controllersFORWARD->|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|

air traffic control, aviation, chat
tower controllers, approach controller

air traffic control, aviation, chat room

StuckMic exists for the sole purpose of providing a FREE discussion forum by which issues affecting the world's aviation community can be openly discussed absent formal bureaucratic hierarchies.

StuckMic is an independent, issue-neutral corporality not associated with any labor organization(s) or government entities of any country.

Whether you're an air traffic controller, a pilot or an aviation enthusiast, StuckMic is a great place to exchange ideas and find inside aviation information you won't find anywhere else. We maintain a diverse range of members including pilots, air traffic controllers (Center, Tower, Approach and TRACON), NATCA members, ALPA members, PATCO members and aviation enthusiasts from around the globe.

There are NO requirements ... join for FREE!

JOIN OUR DISCUSSION FORUM

OR PERUSE OUR MESSAGES AS A GUEST!
controllers, federal employee


"Honest feedback from the aviation community with
all the usual political and bureaucratic filters removed..."


federal employees, facilities, tracon
TRACON, tracons, approach, approaches