1968 Roadrunner68 Roadrunnerchat, air traffic control, chat room, air traffic controllerchat, air traffic control, chat room, air traffic controllerdiscuss, air traffic controllers, discussion, tower controllertower controllers, approach, approach control, approach controllerscontroller, air traffic, approach controller, controllers, aviationapproaches, tracons, aircraft, control, tracon, atc, artccradar, natca, faa, ifr, vfr, patco, dod, aopa, center, towerfacility, pilot, airline, airplane, centers, towers, facilitiespilots, airlines, airplanes
Stuckmic.com Aviation and Air Traffic Control discussion

aviation, aviation enthusiasts, aircraft
(Chat and discussion topics: air traffic controllers, approach control, DOD, air traffic controller, alpa, pilot, AOPA, ata, natcanet, controllers, aviation, air traffic control, aircraft, centers, towers, facilities, pilots, airlines, airplanes, chat, chat room, tower controller, tower controllers, approach, approach controllers, controller, approaches, tracons, control, TRACON, ATC, ARTCC, RADAR, NATCA, FAA, IFR, VFR, PATCO, ALPA, ATA, federal employee, union, labor union, bargaining unit, contract, discussion, federal employees, unions, labor unions, bargaining units, contracts, discussions, news, national, association, natcavoice, aviation enthusiasts, aviation enthusiast)

approach controllers, controller
Welcome to StuckMic.com, an aviation and air traffic control discussion forum!

air traffic controller, tower controller
Below is a sample message posted by one of our hundreds of users.

airplane, airplanes, airline, airlines

pilot, pilots, FAA, IFR, VFR, faa, ifr
vfr, NATCA, PATCO, ALPA, ATA, natcaTHREAD:News's Thread
patco, alpa, ata, union, unionsSUBJECT:FAA_Reauthorization_Dead
labor unions, bargaining unitsTO:shizzy
bargaining unit, contracts, contractFROM:ihate2fly
natcanet, national, associationPOSTED: 2/29/2008, 11:55PM EDT

ihate2fly wrote[TO: shizzy]
Since it's apparent you're not a student of the US Constitution let me help you with a little bit of knowledge.

A Congress lasts 2 years. Each year is called a session. We are presently in the 110th Congress, 2nd Session.

Article 1, Section 7 says "if any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law."

The 20th Amendment sets as noon of January 3rd, or another day as passed into law as the day the Congress shall assemble.

What this all means is:

- if FAA Reauthorization is not passed before Congress adjourns in December 2008 for their winter holiday, the whole process has to start at square one because no bill introduced in a Congress can carry over to another Congress.

- if FAA Reauthorization is passed and then Congress adjourns and the President refuses to sign it, it is "pocket vetoed" and it's back to square one.

- Back to square one means the bill has to be introduced in both Houses of Congress, there have to be committee hearings (again), each house has to vote on the bill, the bills have to go to conference committee for reconcilliation, they then have to be voted on again, and sent to the President for signature or veto. If it's vetoed, they have to be voted on again to see if it can be overridden.

Either way NATCA gets screwed. When the Senate Aviation Subcommittee Chairman says FAA Reauthorization is dead, chances are it's dead. He knows both the House and Senate don't have the votes to implement the $25 per IFR flight on business jets/GA aircraft. In fact, it has already been voted down in the House by a large majority of Dems and Reps. The issue of NATCA isn't even a factor in getting the bill to pass. It just makes a good talking point and allows folks to make speeches and threats.

If nothing moves this year, it'll be another 12-16 months before anything happens, IF anything happens. Hell, it'll almost be time to re-open contract negotiations on a new contract before this thing is settled.

JOIN NOW!news, atc, ATC, air traffic, control100% FREE!
< < < -- PREVIOUS MESSAGE NEXT MESSAGE -- > > >
|15|14|13|12|11|10|9|8|7|6|5|4|3|2|1| <-BACKair traffic control, air traffic controllersFORWARD->|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|

air traffic control, aviation, chat
tower controllers, approach controller

air traffic control, aviation, chat room

StuckMic exists for the sole purpose of providing a FREE discussion forum by which issues affecting the world's aviation community can be openly discussed absent formal bureaucratic hierarchies.

StuckMic is an independent, issue-neutral corporality not associated with any labor organization(s) or government entities of any country.

Whether you're an air traffic controller, a pilot or an aviation enthusiast, StuckMic is a great place to exchange ideas and find inside aviation information you won't find anywhere else. We maintain a diverse range of members including pilots, air traffic controllers (Center, Tower, Approach and TRACON), NATCA members, ALPA members, PATCO members and aviation enthusiasts from around the globe.

There are NO requirements ... join for FREE!

JOIN OUR DISCUSSION FORUM

OR PERUSE OUR MESSAGES AS A GUEST!
controllers, federal employee


"Honest feedback from the aviation community with
all the usual political and bureaucratic filters removed..."


federal employees, facilities, tracon
TRACON, tracons, approach, approaches