| #11 | |||||
|
|
Re: Boeing VS Airbus...
Posted: 05-19-2009, 06:48 PM
Not exactly, it's dry because the capacity of air to hold water at -40F is almost nothing.
Now the reason you state could be the reason they don't run humidifiers but I find that very unlikely. I find it unlikely that the cabin air system is independent of the engines as well (but haven't followed the 787 aside from the inability of boeing to get it to market on time) where are they getting air for the pressurization system? |
||||
|
|
|
| #12 | |||||
|
|
Re: Boeing VS Airbus...
Posted: 05-19-2009, 07:04 PM http://www.usatoday.com/money/biztra...air-usat_x.htm
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
| #13 | |||||
|
|
Re: Boeing VS Airbus...
Posted: 05-19-2009, 07:07 PM Furthermore....
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
| #14 | |||||
|
|
Re: Boeing VS Airbus...
Posted: 05-19-2009, 07:10 PM |
||||
|
|
| #15 | |||||
|
|
Re: Boeing VS Airbus...
Posted: 05-19-2009, 07:11 PM Quote:
|
||||
|
|
| #16 | |||||
|
|
Re: Boeing VS Airbus...
Posted: 05-19-2009, 07:25 PM Quote:
If you really want to pick apart the context of my OP and prove thou art a better analyst and arguer by me guest. We're both right |
||||
|
|
| #17 | |||||
|
|
Re: Boeing VS Airbus...
Posted: 05-19-2009, 07:29 PM Quote:
3 to one probably? the cabin is dry because it's retarded to waste payload hauling around water and humidifiers to bump the cabin from 4 to 15% |
||||
|
|
| #19 | |||||
|
|
Re: Boeing VS Airbus...
Posted: 02-23-2010, 11:23 PM
Shoot, man, I like riding it just for the seats. I guess it varies by airline, but flying out and back from Korea a couple months ago, the 777 had the 747 beat hands down. That's more comfy than anything I've got at home. Course, most of that stuff's inflatable, but you get my point.
|
||||
|
|