| #1 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-16-2009, 03:45 PM Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
| #2 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-16-2009, 05:01 PM Quote:
|
||||
|
|
| #3 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-16-2009, 06:15 PM |
||||
|
|
| #4 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-16-2009, 06:20 PM pretty much, lol....
|
||||
|
|
| #5 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-16-2009, 10:41 PM I'm going to take a stab at this and say that the applications are picked by a computer on "buzzwords"..words such as "advanced", "completed", "progressed", etc, etc. I'm guessing that if your application didn't have a specific set of words, the computer didn't pick it up for review and advancement in the process...several large corporations do the same thing for their hiring process, and it eliminates the need for reading thousands of resumes.
|
||||
|
|
| #6 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-16-2009, 11:36 PM Quote:
|
||||
|
|
| #7 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-17-2009, 12:16 AM Quote:
|
||||
|
|
| #8 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-17-2009, 10:47 PM Quote:
![]() |
||||
|
|
| #10 | |||||
|
|
Re: Info about panels ... No B.S.
Posted: 12-18-2009, 01:03 AM Quote:
The reason is because very little non-controlling experience is of any use as a prediction of success as a controller. There's some benefit to holding a pilot's license, and a little for having an aviation background which can be verified (which is why they ask about both on the application, with the latter being the CTI option). But neither have proven to be an indication that an applicant will be a good controller. You have guys come into it with advanced degrees and guys coming in who've only finished high school. Success rate is about the same with both, so there's no practical reason to try to filter applications to find people who know which buzzwords to use. It wouldn't provide any benefit. On a related note, that's why the AT-SAT was created -- it was a means to try and determine the capacity of how an applicant may perform as a controller, however imperfect the test may be. Of course, with so many people scoring well (and scores generally rising due to jerks putting study guides online and messing it up for the FAA), they've got more "well qualified" individuals than they need on their hands. Therefore, it's down to a random crapshoot. Feeling lucky? |
||||
|
|