Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
Name or Email:   Password:   Register Now  
Search Stuck Mic
 
  #1
Offline
BCLIFTON
Baja Blast is the shit!!!
Got another thread landing clearances?
Posted: 08-27-2010, 11:50 PM

Okay so I am curious to what the difference is and what you all say. When giving a landing clearance. Do you say when there is an aircraft that is not number one to the runway and is being sequenced by approach? Do you reissue the wake turb if it was already done by approach and do you say following, traffic type and position. Do you say traffic or following? And when you have pattern traffic, do you restate the sequence traffic type and position? This could prob be two or three threads by now.....

N1234, Tower, following a caravan 2 mile final runway 19L Cleared to land.

N1234, Tower, traffic caravan 2 mile final runway 19L cleared to land.

If he the aircraft says we have the traffic insight in he comes on to your frequency do you do this again? or just say CS and cleared to land?

Thanks
Sponsored Ad
Google Adsense

  #2
atcguruaf's Avatar
atcguruaf
Rico Suave
AZ
Re: Got another thread landing clearances?
Posted: 08-28-2010, 12:24 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCLIFTON View Post
Okay so I am curious to what the difference is and what you all say. When giving a landing clearance. Do you say when there is an aircraft that is not number one to the runway and is being sequenced by approach? Do you reissue the wake turb if it was already done by approach and do you say following, traffic type and position. Do you say traffic or following? And when you have pattern traffic, do you restate the sequence traffic type and position? This could prob be two or three threads by now.....

N1234, Tower, following a caravan 2 mile final runway 19L Cleared to land.

N1234, Tower, traffic caravan 2 mile final runway 19L cleared to land.

If he the aircraft says we have the traffic insight in he comes on to your frequency do you do this again? or just say CS and cleared to land?

Thanks
1. No. I just issue the traffic. For example, if someone checks in, being sequenced by approach, I say "N12345, traffic, cessna 2 mile final, runway XX cleared to land."

2. Yes, I reissue wake turbulence.

3. No, I do not say the traffic type and position. If approach has already done that, I just give the cautionary.

4. It depends on the situation. If I am doing the sequencing, I will say "N12345, #2, FOLLOW (not following) Cherokee, 3 mile final, runway xx, cleared to land."

If I am NOT doing the sequencing, I simply state "N12345, Traffic, Cherokee, 3 mile final, runway xx, cleared to land."

5. I'm having difficulty with the last question. Perhaps you can include an example or something so I can better understand what you're talking about.
The Following User Says Thank You to atcguruaf For This Useful Post:
KDskylark (08-28-2010)
  #3
Offline
KDskylark
Junior Member
New York, NY
Re: Got another thread landing clearances?
Posted: 08-28-2010, 09:11 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCLIFTON View Post
If he the aircraft says we have the traffic insight in he comes on to your frequency do you do this again? or just say CS and cleared to land?
If the A/C checks in and says "# 2 behind..." or "following the..." then you don't have to restate the traffic. By stating something like that they just confirmed that approach gave them the sequence.
  #4
Offline
BCLIFTON
Baja Blast is the shit!!!
Re: Got another thread landing clearances?
Posted: 08-28-2010, 02:23 PM

Thanks! I finally got some more clarification from my instructor on this. Got things hashed out.

Powered by Stuck Mic Copyright StuckMic.com
Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
© 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved
Current time: 11:13 PM (All times are GMT -5)

Stuck Mic - Air Traffic Control - ATC - Aviation