Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
Name or Email:   Password:   Register Now  
Search Stuck Mic
 
  #1
Wponcho's Avatar
Offline
Wponcho
Junior Member
Orlando
Altitude Restricted Low Approach
Posted: 08-17-2012, 11:57 PM

Some questions about other facilities. At what altitude do you clear a restricted low approach at and what is your field elevation?

This is found in the .65 3-10-10

Think about what the book says and what is the real altitude its being conducted at?
  #2
JoshATC's Avatar
Offline
JoshATC
Senior Analyst
It says in black and white ... A low approach with an altitude restriction of NOT LESS THAN 500 feet above the airport.

So in the case of USMC I would say the one with field elevation of 7 feet (RJOI) and your doing 500 I would question that as its only 493ft.

I know its splitting hairs , but it doesn't say anywhere in this chapter that you round your field elevation THEN do the 500.
  #3
atcguruaf's Avatar
atcguruaf
Rico Suave
Right here
Re: Altitude Restricted Low Approach
Posted: 08-18-2012, 06:25 PM

I used to just say cleared low approach at or above 500 ft. AGL
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to atcguruaf For This Useful Post:
MIAvectors (09-05-2012), MichaelGraham (08-19-2012)
  #4
Wponcho's Avatar
Offline
Wponcho
Junior Member
Orlando
Re: Altitude Restricted Low Approach
Posted: 08-19-2012, 07:53 PM

Just wondering, it seems as though it's different everywhere you go and each person you ask. Since it says "500 above the airport," that means to me: "cleared low approach at or above 500." Some would say that every clearance no matter what is in MSL, meaning that a field elevation of 7' would mean 550 or 600. Just a thought, thanks for the replies. In the AF, I would and still say the above.
  #5
JoshATC's Avatar
Offline
JoshATC
Senior Analyst
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wponcho:215908
Just wondering, it seems as though it's different everywhere you go and each person you ask. Since it says "500 above the airport," that means to me: "cleared low approach at or above 500." Some would say that every clearance no matter what is in MSL, meaning that a field elevation of 7' would mean 550 or 600. Just a thought, thanks for the replies. In the AF, I would and still say the above.
Your right every clearance is in MSL so if the field elevation is 7 feet I would say "cleared low approach at or above 550ft" or like atcguru said "cleared low aporoach at or above 500ft AGL". Both are correcy IMO.
  #6
Offline
DavidSW
Rookie
Barksdale AFB
Re: Altitude Restricted Low Approach
Posted: 08-19-2012, 09:21 PM

Field elevation 166, LA at or above 700, sometimes 1200 for heavies.
  #7
JoshATC's Avatar
Offline
JoshATC
Senior Analyst
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidSW:215915
Field elevation 166, LA at or above 700, sometimes 1200 for heavies.
I would agree with this. Its RECOMMENDED 1000ft for heavies but NOT REQUIRED.
  #8
john's Avatar
Offline
john
Newcomer
Re: Altitude Restricted Low Approach
Posted: 08-30-2012, 08:33 PM

At Cairns AAF, Fort Rucker, AL we clear them for Low Approach at or above 800 and issue traffic... Field elevation 301'
  #9
initialize's Avatar
Offline
initialize
Newcomer
Germany
Re: Altitude Restricted Low Approach
Posted: 09-04-2012, 05:19 AM

Hey guys, quick question here. The tower I work at is in shenanigans because I cleared an aircraft for a restricted low 500' above another aircraft taxiing down the runway who WAS NOT a departure aircraft or positioning in hold.

Me and other controllers have done this multiple times before, but for some reason some people are in cahoots over this. I'm right, right? I just want to make sure in case this shit hits the fan and I have to prove them wrong
  #10
j_time41's Avatar
Offline
j_time41
Trusted Contributor
Fargo, ND
Re: Altitude Restricted Low Approach
Posted: 09-04-2012, 09:12 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by initialize View Post
Hey guys, quick question here. The tower I work at is in shenanigans because I cleared an aircraft for a restricted low 500' above another aircraft taxiing down the runway who WAS NOT a departure aircraft or positioning in hold.

Me and other controllers have done this multiple times before, but for some reason some people are in cahoots over this. I'm right, right? I just want to make sure in case this shit hits the fan and I have to prove them wrong
He could be 5 feet above him. As long as you have visual....your good

Powered by Stuck Mic Copyright StuckMic.com
Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
© 1999 - 2013 All rights reserved
Current time: 10:12 PM (All times are GMT -5)

Stuck Mic - Air Traffic Control - ATC - Aviation