Username:   Password:   Not A Member - Register Now!  

Home | Forums | Gallery | Videos | Books | Blogs | Reviews | Articles | Shop SM  
 
    
 


Military GCA and VFR/IFR

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
     08-14-2008, 07:47 PM
KB9LEF's Avatar
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 21
KB9LEF is on a distinguished road
Default Military GCA and VFR/IFR

Question. I pretty much think I know what the rules are on this from reading the 7110.65, 7210.3, and AIM.

We have a GCA Arrival Pattern that vectors IFR/VFR aircraft for PAR/ASR approachs into Class D control tower airfiled. This a "pattern" delegated to us by the Approach Control that serves us. This Arrival Pattern exists in Class 'E' airspace.

Most of the time aircraft come in to do multiple PAR's or ASR's. Thier climbout is RWY heading to 2500 (IFR/VFR).

My understanding is Unless a LOA exists for VFR aircraft to recieve seperation services (even if they are being vectored) there is NO seperation (500 & 1 1/2) requirements between these VFR and other VFR/IFR aircraft working in the pattern except for Wake Turbulance Seperation (Ch 5-5-4)...

The only other seperation requirement is between IFR and other IFR a/c.

Is this research/thinking correct?

Thanks for the input/help.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
     08-17-2008, 08:17 PM
ravensteve9's Avatar
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
ravensteve9 is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree. I worked at two DOD airfields that ran approaches to class D towers from class E airspace. No separation minima between VFR/IFR except wake turbulence.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
     08-30-2008, 01:19 AM
k5freek's Avatar
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
k5freek is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Military GCA and VFR/IFR

There is phraseology for that... something like "vfr practice approach approved, no seperation services provided"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
     08-30-2008, 09:53 AM
boondr's Avatar
Junior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 52
boondr is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Military GCA and VFR/IFR

The "no separation services provided" is for uncontrolled airports when an a/c is doing a vfr practice approach(I.E. does not apply to class D airport)

A GCA approach is an instrument approach therefore IFR separation must be provided between aircraft on final. However between an aircraft on final(or any IFR a/c) and a VFR aircraft not on final you only provide 500 ft and "green between".

4-8-11 Practice Approaches

Quote:
a. Separation.
1. IFR aircraft practicing instrument approaches
shall be afforded standard separation in
accordance with Chapter 3, Chapter 4, Chapter 5,
Chapter 6, and Chapter 7 minima until:
(a) The aircraft lands, and the flight is
terminated, or
(b) The pilot cancels the flight plan.
2. Where procedures require application of IFR
separation to VFR aircraft practicing instrument
approaches, standard IFR separation in accordance
with Chapter 3, Chapter 4, Chapter 5, Chapter 6, and
Chapter 7 shall be provided. Controller responsibility
for separation begins at the point where the approach
clearance becomes effective. Except for heavy
aircraft/B757, 500 feet vertical separation may be
applied between VFR aircraft and between a VFR
and an IFR aircraft.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
     08-30-2008, 09:55 AM
1Charlie1's Avatar
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UhMehrka
Posts: 9
Images: 1
1Charlie1 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Military GCA and VFR/IFR

Quote:
Originally Posted by k5freek View Post
There is phraseology for that... something like "vfr practice approach approved, no seperation services provided"
Or "traffic..so and so..good luck" As we used to say in the Air Force VFR stands for Very Fuc*ing Risky
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
     08-30-2008, 01:09 PM
KB9LEF's Avatar
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 21
KB9LEF is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Military GCA and VFR/IFR

Quote:
Originally Posted by boondr View Post
The "no separation services provided" is for uncontrolled airports when an a/c is doing a vfr practice approach(I.E. does not apply to class D airport)

A GCA approach is an instrument approach therefore IFR separation must be provided between aircraft on final. However between an aircraft on final(or any IFR a/c) and a VFR aircraft not on final you only provide 500 ft and "green between".

4-8-11 Practice Approaches

I completely disagree with the later half of your remarks. there is NO seperation requirement I found out in class D or class E airspace EVER except wake tubulance separation for VFR to VFR or VFR to IFR a/c UNLESS an LOA exists (as per 7210.3).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
     08-30-2008, 08:11 PM
kycontroller's Avatar
Junior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 42
kycontroller is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Military GCA and VFR/IFR

If an aircraft, regardless if VFR or IFR, is cleared for an instrument approach it is to be afforded IFR seperation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
     08-30-2008, 10:46 PM
KB9LEF's Avatar
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 21
KB9LEF is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Military GCA and VFR/IFR

Quote:
Originally Posted by kycontroller View Post
If an aircraft, regardless if VFR or IFR, is cleared for an instrument approach it is to be afforded IFR seperation.
OK, where are you getting this info?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
     08-30-2008, 11:16 PM
KB9LEF's Avatar
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 21
KB9LEF is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Military GCA and VFR/IFR

Quote:
Originally Posted by kycontroller View Post
If an aircraft, regardless if VFR or IFR, is cleared for an instrument approach it is to be afforded IFR seperation.
As a matter of fact, there is no where that this info is stated you are wrong. Only requirement is Wake Turbulance unless it is operations are in a TRSA.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
     08-31-2008, 12:20 AM
ColtsATC's Avatar
Active Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 124
Images: 5
Blog Entries: 1
ColtsATC is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to ColtsATC Send a message via Yahoo to ColtsATC
Default Re: Military GCA and VFR/IFR

PARs and ASRs are NOT instrument approaches. Therefore, there are no separation minimums per .65. At our base, we had a LOCAL reg that required 3 miles sep for VFR/IFR to the same runway and 6 miles for opposite direction.

However. I'm fairly certain VFR is not guaranteed separation services when conducting instrument approaches thanks to "no separation services provided." But I'll have to grab my .65 to verify it
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
© Stuck Mic -vBulletin - vBadvanced - SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0

Copyright © 1999 - 2008 - StuckMic.com
Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
Web Hosting by VP Hosts



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70