Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
Name or Email:   Password:   Register Now  
Search Stuck Mic
 
  #1
fng's Avatar
Offline
fng
Newcomer
Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-08-2009, 04:30 AM

If a large AC departs runway 27L and a small AC departs runway 27R, is there any wake turbulence seperation needed to turn the small AC behind the large? or can the small just pass a mile behind the large and just give an advisory? I can't find anything in the 7110.65 talking about this and someone told me that 3 miles was needed.

Thanks
Sponsored Ad
Google Adsense

  #2
Offline
atcbrownie
Trusted Member
Warrenton Va
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-08-2009, 10:38 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by fng View Post
If a large AC departs runway 27L and a small AC departs runway 27R, is there any wake turbulence seperation needed to turn the small AC behind the large? or can the small just pass a mile behind the large and just give an advisory? I can't find anything in the 7110.65 talking about this and someone told me that 3 miles was needed.

Thanks
it depends on how far the parallel runways are separated.
  #3
noid's Avatar
Offline  
noid
Curtis E. Carr
Jawja
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-08-2009, 12:27 PM

The only separation minimum for a small behind a large is on an arrival which is 4 miles or when conducting same runway opposite direction or intersection departures which is 3 minutes (waiverable). It's just good practice to have the smaller aircraft rotate prior to the larger aircraft's rotation point. Everything else has to do with Heavy/747's.


3-9-6.

f. Separate IFR/VFR aircraft taking off behind a
heavy jet/B757 departure by 2 minutes, when
departing:

2. A parallel runway separated by less than
2,500 feet.


i. Separate a small aircraft behind a large aircraft
taking off or making a low/missed approach when
utilizing opposite direction takeoffs on the same
runway by 3 minutes unless a pilot has initiated a
request to deviate from the 3-minute interval. In the
latter case, issue a wake turbulence advisory before
clearing the aircraft for takeoff.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

3-9-8.

b3. Separate IFR/VFR aircraft taking off behind
a heavy jet/B757 departure by 2 minutes when
departing:

(b) A parallel runway separated by 2,500 feet
or more if projected flight paths will cross.
-------------------------------------------------------------

5-5-4

e. Separate aircraft operating directly behind, or
directly behind and less than 1,000 feet below, or
following an aircraft conducting an instrument
approach by:

NOTE-
1. When applying wake turbulence separation criteria,
directly behind means an aircraft is operating within
2500feet of the flight path of the leading aircraft over the
surface of the earth.
2. Consider parallel runways less than 2,500 feet apart as
a single runway because of the possible effects of wake
turbulence.

1. Heavy behind heavy- 4 miles.
2. Large/heavy behind B757- 4 miles.
3. Small behind B757- 5 miles.
4. Small/large behind heavy - 5 miles.
  #4
fng's Avatar
Offline
fng
Newcomer
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-08-2009, 01:21 PM

The runways are more then 2500 feet apart. It is the small passing a mile behind the large in the air after both have taken off that I am curious about...

Thanks
  #5
ATCinWI's Avatar
Offline
ATCinWI
Senior Member
Illinois
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-08-2009, 04:15 PM

If #2 is providing his own visual separation (or is VFR), all you need is an advisory.
  #6
fng's Avatar
Offline
fng
Newcomer
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-09-2009, 01:52 AM

Thankyou, that is what I thought...
  #7
atcguruaf's Avatar
atcguruaf
Rico Suave
AZ
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-09-2009, 02:55 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATCinWI View Post
If #2 is providing his own visual separation (or is VFR), all you need is an advisory.
Technically, you don't even need that. According to the rules, you can just clear the guy for takeoff.
  #8
fng's Avatar
Offline
fng
Newcomer
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-09-2009, 03:12 AM

The takeoff part isnt the issue, the questions is wether or not there is a wake turbulence requirement for a small to pass behind a large in the air.
  #9
fng's Avatar
Offline
fng
Newcomer
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-09-2009, 03:15 AM

I dont even think the small has to have the large in sight, but an advisory would be appropriate. Does anyone think otherwise?
  #10
Roddy_Piper's Avatar
Offline  
Roddy_Piper
Resident Knucklehead
Vegas baby
Re: Possible Wake?
Posted: 08-09-2009, 04:47 AM

no wake turbulence in that situation. u don't even need 6000 feet (obviously).

Powered by Stuck Mic Copyright StuckMic.com
Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
© 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved
Current time: 02:08 PM (All times are GMT -5)

Stuck Mic - Air Traffic Control - ATC - Aviation