Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
Name or Email:   Password:   Register Now  
Search Stuck Mic
 
  #1
Offline  
The Fold
Transmitting in the Blind
South Florida
Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-15-2009, 05:36 AM

So here is my debate topic:

In Class Bravo Airspace, specifically at Miami, when issuing a class Bravo VFR clearance, which would be "more correct"?

1) [Callsign], Cleared out of Bravo Airspace. Maintain VFR at Two Thousand, Five Hundred. Departure [FREQ], Squawk [CODE]

2) [Callsign], Cleared out of Bravo Airspace. Maintain VFR at or below Two Thousand, Five Hundred. Departure [FREQ], Squawk [CODE]

Or neither? And why?

Quote:
7-9-2. VFR AIRCRAFT IN CLASS B AIRSPACE

a. VFR aircraft must obtain an ATC clearance to operate in Class B airspace.

REFERENCE-
FAAO 7110.65, Operational Requests, Para 2-1-18.
FAAO 7110.65, Airspace Classes, Para 2-4-22.

PHRASEOLOGY-
CLEARED THROUGH/TO ENTER/OUT OF BRAVO AIRSPACE,

and as appropriate,

VIA (route). MAINTAIN (altitude) WHILE IN BRAVO AIRSPACE.

or

CLEARED AS REQUESTED.

(Additional instructions, as necessary.)

REMAIN OUTSIDE BRAVO AIRSPACE. (When necessary, reason and/or additional instructions.)
Sponsored Ad
Google Adsense

  #2
joecoolinsc's Avatar
Offline
joecoolinsc
Rookie
Spartanburg, SC
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-15-2009, 08:25 AM

Both are correct. Neither more than the other.

Why? Because you can assign a fixed altitude, an at or above/below altitude, or no altitude at all, as appropriate to the individual situation.
  #3
MikeATC's Avatar
MikeATC
Retired FAA, NATCA Member
Nashville TN
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-15-2009, 05:04 PM

As long as the altitude is not below your MVA, both are correct. My preference would be the 2.
  #4
SnowAviation
Senior Member
Escondido, CA
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-17-2009, 02:42 PM

Agreed. I too prefer to use "at or above" or below but as long as it's above the MVA you are golden.
  #5
noid's Avatar
Offline  
noid
Curtis E. Carr
Jawja
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-17-2009, 02:49 PM

I also agree. It's best to use at or below/above for MVA reasons as well as allowing flexibility in the altitude to remain clear of clouds.
  #6
MikeATC's Avatar
MikeATC
Retired FAA, NATCA Member
Nashville TN
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-18-2009, 10:01 AM

Actually in the .65 it states that you "SHALL NOT" issue altitudes below your MVA.
  #7
meatasaurusx
Trusted Member
Chi-town
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-18-2009, 09:18 PM

You can however tell an aircraft to maintain vfr below the mva and as long as you do not give them an ifr clearance below the mva, you are not doing anything wrong. Being vfr, it is on them to maintain terrain and obstruction clearance and they are supposed to tell you it they cannot do so.

Also, atc is required to inform a pilot when they are leaving the bravo so I think it would be more appropriate to say maintain vfr at or below once they have left the bravo. From what your example says, im assuming that departure would be controlling the aircraft when they would be exiting the bravo anyways
  #8
Offline  
The Fold
Transmitting in the Blind
South Florida
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-19-2009, 10:26 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by meatasaurusx View Post
You can however tell an aircraft to maintain vfr below the mva and as long as you do not give them an ifr clearance below the mva, you are not doing anything wrong. Being vfr, it is on them to maintain terrain and obstruction clearance and they are supposed to tell you it they cannot do so.

Also, atc is required to inform a pilot when they are leaving the bravo so I think it would be more appropriate to say maintain vfr at or below once they have left the bravo. From what your example says, im assuming that departure would be controlling the aircraft when they would be exiting the bravo anyways
Indeed. For my example, I'm referencing Miami, although it doesn't really matter.

I would lean towards "maintain VFR at 2,500" because the aircraft would be a departure, and in Class Bravo, you wouldn't want an aircraft doing his own thing at or above or at or below. He's still VFR aand he can still avoid clouds as needed, or inform you if otherwise.

I apprieciate all your comments, though.
  #9
SnowAviation
Senior Member
Escondido, CA
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-20-2009, 07:08 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by meatasaurusx View Post
You can however tell an aircraft to maintain vfr below the mva and as long as you do not give them an ifr clearance below the mva, you are not doing anything wrong. Being vfr, it is on them to maintain terrain and obstruction clearance and they are supposed to tell you it they cannot do so.

Also, atc is required to inform a pilot when they are leaving the bravo so I think it would be more appropriate to say maintain vfr at or below once they have left the bravo. From what your example says, im assuming that departure would be controlling the aircraft when they would be exiting the bravo anyways
I'm not sure that's true, do you have a 7110 reference? or are you talking about aircraft you are NOT vectoring?
  #10
joecoolinsc's Avatar
Offline
joecoolinsc
Rookie
Spartanburg, SC
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-20-2009, 11:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowAviation View Post
I'm not sure that's true, do you have a 7110 reference? or are you talking about aircraft you are NOT vectoring?
You're right Snow, it's not.

7-8-5. ALTITUDE ASSIGNMENTS
a. When necessary to assign altitudes to VFR
aircraft, assign altitudes that meet the MVA, MSA, or
minimum IFR altitude criteria.


This language appears several times in the .65

You may vector VFR's at any altitude but if you assign an altitude it must meet MVA, MSA or MIA.

Powered by Stuck Mic Copyright StuckMic.com
Air Traffic Control - Aviation Information
© 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved
Current time: 08:34 PM (All times are GMT -5)

Stuck Mic - Air Traffic Control - ATC - Aviation