| #1 | |||||
|
|
Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-15-2009, 05:36 AM So here is my debate topic:
In Class Bravo Airspace, specifically at Miami, when issuing a class Bravo VFR clearance, which would be "more correct"? 1) [Callsign], Cleared out of Bravo Airspace. Maintain VFR at Two Thousand, Five Hundred. Departure [FREQ], Squawk [CODE] 2) [Callsign], Cleared out of Bravo Airspace. Maintain VFR at or below Two Thousand, Five Hundred. Departure [FREQ], Squawk [CODE] Or neither? And why? Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
| #2 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-15-2009, 08:25 AM Both are correct. Neither more than the other.
Why? Because you can assign a fixed altitude, an at or above/below altitude, or no altitude at all, as appropriate to the individual situation. |
||||
|
|
| #3 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-15-2009, 05:04 PM As long as the altitude is not below your MVA, both are correct. My preference would be the 2.
|
||||
|
|
| #4 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-17-2009, 02:42 PM Agreed. I too prefer to use "at or above" or below but as long as it's above the MVA you are golden.
|
||||
|
|
| #5 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-17-2009, 02:49 PM I also agree. It's best to use at or below/above for MVA reasons as well as allowing flexibility in the altitude to remain clear of clouds.
|
||||
|
|
| #6 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-18-2009, 10:01 AM Actually in the .65 it states that you "SHALL NOT" issue altitudes below your MVA.
|
||||
|
|
| #7 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-18-2009, 09:18 PM You can however tell an aircraft to maintain vfr below the mva and as long as you do not give them an ifr clearance below the mva, you are not doing anything wrong. Being vfr, it is on them to maintain terrain and obstruction clearance and they are supposed to tell you it they cannot do so.
Also, atc is required to inform a pilot when they are leaving the bravo so I think it would be more appropriate to say maintain vfr at or below once they have left the bravo. From what your example says, im assuming that departure would be controlling the aircraft when they would be exiting the bravo anyways |
||||
|
|
| #8 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-19-2009, 10:26 AM Quote:
I would lean towards "maintain VFR at 2,500" because the aircraft would be a departure, and in Class Bravo, you wouldn't want an aircraft doing his own thing at or above or at or below. He's still VFR aand he can still avoid clouds as needed, or inform you if otherwise. I apprieciate all your comments, though. ![]() |
||||
|
|
| #9 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-20-2009, 07:08 PM Quote:
|
||||
|
|
| #10 | |||||
|
|
Re: Splitting Hairs: Maintain VFR at / Maintain at or below
Posted: 08-20-2009, 11:14 PM Quote:
7-8-5. ALTITUDE ASSIGNMENTS a. When necessary to assign altitudes to VFR aircraft, assign altitudes that meet the MVA, MSA, or minimum IFR altitude criteria. This language appears several times in the .65 You may vector VFR's at any altitude but if you assign an altitude it must meet MVA, MSA or MIA. |
||||
|
|