| #1 | |||||
|
|
Non-Qualifying ATC Experience
Posted: 02-09-2010, 06:39 PM Does anyone else feel the FAA's list for Non-Qualifying ATC Experience on ASAP is a load of bull and bit of a kick in the balls???
|
||||
|
|
|
| #4 | |||||
|
|
Re: Non-Qualifying ATC Experience
Posted: 02-10-2010, 12:53 AM while supporting the troops is important, the goal is quality CPC(FPL)s. A big leg up is working traffic comparable to what the FAA does... hence the application.
Makes perfect sense to me. |
||||
|
|
| #5 | |||||
|
|
Re: Non-Qualifying ATC Experience
Posted: 02-10-2010, 02:00 AM |
||||
|
|
| #6 | |||||
|
|
Re: Non-Qualifying ATC Experience
Posted: 04-05-2010, 06:15 PM
Running a GCA approach is a little more involved than what is stated. If in fact you were referring to somebody running a PAR final. However, I understand that translates in to absolutely nothing within the FAA. So I believe that GCA should not be qualifying experience. And yes there are alot of BS military controllers that had their courtesy ratings due to their rank or position. So weed out all the BS.
|
||||
|
|
| #7 | |||||
|
|
Re: Non-Qualifying ATC Experience
Posted: 04-07-2010, 01:59 PM Quote:
Yeah dude... GCA's can get slammed with up to FOUR aircraft. four dude, i cant believe i have to talk to more than two... inoright |
||||
|
|
| #10 | |||||
|
|
Re: Non-Qualifying ATC Experience
Posted: 04-07-2010, 05:57 PM correct me if im wrong (and im not trying to be asshole-ish) but are there gca's that have more than 3 useable altitudes? ive seen about 7 of them and all of them are like sfc-4000 with an mva of 2000 or something similar (2 useable altitudes, like i said), and airspace wise its enough to run a tight radar pattern and nothing else.
|
||||
|
|