Recent content by Yankeesfan2615

People need to visualize the amount of money wasted. Wasn't there stats touting money saved from the CTI hires? Not to mention re-administering at-sats as well as giving more...

Bigger the sample size the better IMO unless you are seeing a big correlation.

My contact informed me I wasn't selected. I do know for sure.

I'm Pubnat 8 OTS. I wasn't selected.

They finished selecting candidates last week. It seems like a delay of the inevitable. (I'm not blaming Aviation Careers).

OP: Were you OTS, VRA, or CTI? I'm OTS for Pubnat 8 but haven't seen any new geo prefs e-mail since October.

B.S. from UNLV (2009)

Vegas, if not then CA.

I heard April.

Here's my prediction on hiring. WQ CTI/Military will be selected first, WQ public hires after. How many people tested: 8,000? Of that how many scored well-qualified? That's how I look at it.

I recieeved a 93.6!

93.6 from Fullerton 11/10!!!

Didn't get my grade yet but Dials- 2 wrong at max Math - Estimate 2 wrong at max (only if I mixed up ground speed with air speed and answering too quickly) Angles - Maybe 1 or 2 wrong max. Scan -I'm really good with 10 key (thanks to my data entry job) So I'd imagine I did pretty well. Letter...

You know what annoyed me, I breezed through the dials and had time to spare at the end but I swear for the life of me one of the fuel/air ratio questions didn't contain the right answer. Btw, I wonder if the practice versions of the scan game and letter factory aren't allowed to be completely...

Took it today at Fullerton. Felt confident about dials, angles, scan, and math. Analogies, scenario, and letter factory...not so much. I really hope I got a 90 but If not I've got a degree and next years test to fall back on.